All I said was it has been proven that Nessy isnt real and that the changes of finding an elephant swimming in frezzing cold water in Scotland is somewhat slim.
>_>
unless you have prof that the monster is fake... witch you dont...
i would say you need to do some research!
unless you have prof that the monster is fake... witch you dont...
i would say you need to do some research!
The burden of proof is on you, sweetheart. We're not the ones claiming a giant monster is swimming a loch in Scotland, eating a supply of fish that couldn't sustain it.
The modern legend of Nessie begins in 1934 with Dr. Robert Kenneth Wilson, a London physician, who allegedly photographed a plesiosaur-like beast with a long neck emerging out of the murky waters. That photo created quite a fuss. Before the photo, Loch Ness was the stuff of legend and myth. The locals knew the ancient history of the sea serpent. But people came to the lake more to relax than to go on expeditions looking for mythical beasts. After the phwilson hoax photooto, the scientific experts were called in. First, they examined the photo itself. Could be a plesiosaur. Yes, but it could be a tree trunk, too. Or an otter. Later, there would be explorations by a submarine with high tech sensing devices. Today, we have a full-blown tourist industry said to have generated about $37 million in 1993, complete with submarine rides (about one hundred bucks an hour in 1994) and a multi-media tourist center. For those who can't go to Scotland, there is a webcam site for your viewing pleasure.
DID NOT WRITE THIS ;)
UNKNOWN CAUCUS...
WHAT THEY THINK...
I was born in Scotland and I never saw the Loch Ness Monster. It would be cool to see her though.
Hey, research backs up every thing you got to admit...
Pictures can't prove anything nowadays. I can take a picture of my brother and photoshop a deer head on him, and claim I've found a new species of animal.
Linear Mode
