Official Friendcodes 3 vs 3 Pokemon Tournament

[IchooseU]

Yay an other tourney that will NOT finish.

[LucarioLegend]

ill sign up for it

[SockPuppet]

Originally Posted by Postman

Those are the most remedial rules ever.

Why not just enter with three Pokemon?

WTH can't have Skarmory and Blissey on the same team? Why is this? Because they are metagame weak? Because Infernape, Zapdos, Tyranitar, Lucario, ect all kill them?

Maybe you should fix the rules so they don't look... like that...

Using all six makes the game lasts a bit longer as than using simply three Pokemon. Players still lose if they lost three Pokemon.

Skar-Bliss clause is in effect; I merely just posted the description rather than using the shortcut clauses just to make sure people are reading. :cool:

[Impact900]

*currently signing name up*

[Mr.Sean]

count me in please :]

[Zetetic]

Oh wth I'll give this a shot. I may fail horribly or this may be what I need to get my team building back on the right course.

[Mr. Moniker]

Mah boi, I'm in.

[Postman]

Originally Posted by SockPuppet

Using all six makes the game lasts a bit longer as than using simply three Pokemon. Players still lose if they lost three Pokemon.

Skar-Bliss clause is in effect; I merely just posted the description rather than using the shortcut clauses just to make sure people are reading. :cool:

Okay, so from this it's not really a three versus three battle. You use all six of your Pokemon and when three of them die you lose? >_>

WHY is SkarmBliss even there? It's not an official rule. Some ••••••s who don't know how to play D/P/P made up that rule.

Why is that rule up?

[Shaco]

I agree with Postman, it doesn't even make sense :/

[Zant]

I would honestly love to enter, except, my brother keeps being a jerk to me and won't let me use his DS