Quote:
Originally Posted by zarif
Of course people will vote brawl. Nintendo made Brawl as a better version of Melee.
|
Better version as in Graphics and details yes, but in terms of gameplay, Melee definitely takes that away...
lol... Melee no doubt, I just really don't want to go into details... BUT OH WELL
Why Melee is better!
-Their seems to be always fast paced battles compared to Brawl, A match with a Fox and Falco normally lasts 1-2m lol
-Certain Techniques such as L-canceling, wave-dashing/landing, SHFFL'ing, and others!
-Teching/Ukemi (in Brawl terms) is way easier and much more reliable in Melee
-Combos are more respected due to the complexity and stuff
-Most characters are way better in Melee before Brawl, Fox was unique with his JC shining and such, Falco had Shine Pillaring and SHL, Marth was known for his extremely large grab range and attacks which led to combos and such (way easier), Peach was known for her Down smash (lol), IC for their unique grab combos that were much cooler than Brawl WOBBLING *cough*, their were many others, but I can't explain them at the moment (My main characters are Bowser and Luigi in Melee).
- Skill was certainly a factor in Melee, sure you can spam, but in Melee... you are definitely not getting away with it unlike Brawl.
- Anyone can chain grab (dunno about the tether characters)
- Edge-hogging techniques were more easier in Melee such as intercepting and such... and since not that much characters had sweet spot edge grabbing, they could be hit before they grab the ledge, unlike Brawl
The list can go on..., but lets just leave it at that
Brawl is not a bad game, but more as an "easier" version of Melee... to me, but minus important AT's