[Tax]

I do.
The reason I ask is because I was called a spammer when chain-grabbing a Ganondorf. I took him from 0% to 97%.
Did I spam? Or is he just a sore loser?
Yup, two questions in one thread.
And a poll!

[iKhaos]

In my opinion, he's just being a sore loser.

And if it isn't noticeable, I do approve of chain-grabbing. XD

[Phazon]

Sore loser. Unless you chain grab into a wall with an infinite, then its fair.

[Kayzee]

Originally Posted by yunglink66

I do.
The reason I ask is because I was called a spammer when chain-grabbing a Ganondorf. I took him from 0% to 97%.
Did I spam? Or is he just a sore loser?
Yup, two questions in one thread.
And a poll!

While I approve of chain grabbing, don't you think 0 to near 100% chain grab is a bit much?

[Tax]

Originally Posted by MetaKnight18

While I approve of chain grabbing, don't you think 0 to near 100% chain grab is a bit much?

I couldn't help it!
XD!

[Shade]

That's his fault, he was Ganondorf. Not your fault Ganondorf is so fat that he can't tech out of anything.

[johnmcgerber]

i dont really mind a chain grab but it is consider spam so i rarely do it

[ETC]

To me, spamming and chain-grabbing are two different things :/

I think chain-grabbing takes more skill than spamming, and easier to get out of.

I vote sore-loser :/...

EDIT: There's nothing wrong with Ganondorf . lol

[BearJaw]

Chain grabs aren't easy. Spamming is very easy. Sore loser and loser for picking Ganondork.

[Alucard777]

Originally Posted by Shade

That's his fault, he was Ganondorf. Not your fault Ganondorf is so fat that he can't tech out of anything.

Ganondorf is not fat, just old. Anyway, I approve of chain-grabbing, but, 0 to 97 is a bit much. Your opponent was being a sore loser. Also, the tag made me laugh.